Posts tagged metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC)
Real-world patterns of biomarker testing and targeted therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in the community oncology setting

Background: National guidelines recommend biomarker testing in mNSCLC, and targeted therapy is associated with improved outcomes. The aim of this study was to understand the real-world biomarker testing and treatment patterns in the community setting. Conclusions: Despite availability of promising biomarker-based therapies, the lack of adequate testing in the community oncology setting means that not all eligible patients are receiving the most effective therapies upfront. Nearly 61% of patients had no DM test reported before 1L treatment in this mNSCLC cohort (all histologies), and some were determined to be DM positive at a later time, highlighting a missed opportunity to employ the most effective biomarker-directed front-line treatment. Next steps in this study will include assessing patterns by histology. READ ARTICLE

Journal of Clinical Oncology DOI:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9079

Authors: Eric S. Nadler, Anupama Vasudevan, Kalatu Davies, Yunfei Wang, Ravindra Gupta, Sarika Ogale

Read More
Biomarker tissue journey among patients (pts) with untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in the U.S. Oncology Network community practices

Background: Given the importance of molecular testing and targeted therapy for mNSCLC, the MYLUNG (Molecularly Informed Lung Cancer Treatment in a Community Cancer Network) consortium pragmatic study assessed real-world biomarker testing rates and turnaround times (TAT) within The US Oncology Network of over 1,000 providers across the United States. Conclusions: This real-world study showed that most pts received at least one biomarker test prior to 1L, but <50% received all 5 tests. NGS testing occurred in <50% of pts but increased over the periods examined. Median time from dx to 1L therapy was about 5 weeks and TAT from orders to results about 2 weeks. Analyses by histology and other trends will be reported. These data will be compared to the next phase of the MYLUNG study, which will evaluate contemporary ordering practices and TATs prospectively. READ ARTICLE

Journal of Clinical Oncology DOI:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9004

Authors: Nicholas J. Robert, Esmond D. Nwokeji, Janet L. Espirito, Liwei Chen, Mandar Karhade, Makenzi Colleen Evangelist, Alexander I. Spira, Marcus A. Neubauer, Susie A. Bullock, Robert L. Coleman, on behalf of MYLUNG Consortium Collaborators: The U.S. Oncology Network and sponsors

Read More