Objective: To evaluate differences of EML4-ALK positive rates in tissues samples between immunohistochemistry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and the next-generation sequencing method. Besides, to compare the differences of EML4-ALK positive rates in blood samples and tissue samples by next-generation sequencing. The results provide a basis for the selection of a suitable EML4-ALK fusion gene detection method. Conclusion: Among the three methods for detecting EML4-ALK, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction has the highest positive rate, followed by immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing has the lowest positive rate. The positive detection rate of EML4-ALK in tissue samples by next-generation sequencing was higher than that in blood samples. READ ARTICLE
Journal of Cancer DOI:10.7150/jca.36580
Authors: Shan Lu, Can Lu, YuXuan Xiao, Wei Zhu, QiuYan He, Bin Xie, JianHua Zhou, YongGuang Tao, Shuang Liu, DeSheng Xiao
